aki Urdangarin attorney accused in a letter to the trial judge Palma Arena violate his appropriate to defend the "worth judgments" issued in a auto in which held, inter alia, that the Duke "Was constantly behind the corporate network" investigated fo

In the view of counsel for the Duke of Palma, Mario Pascual Vives, Judge Jose Castro issued "in haste a pre-judgment" against his consumer statements in this vehicle with him have been a "clear helplessness," which the court denied in a resolution in response to your letter.

The attorney asked in a letter dated final Tuesday a variety of clarifications on a judge's purchase on 13 in which he asserted that statements attributed to Urdangarin positioned as "Rector" of the group of firms linked to the Institute Nos and extra that "does not very persuade" his explanation that his work was restricted to sporting troubles.

According to counsel, Castro manufactured a series of "claims" and "worth judgments" in the vehicle that involve "a violation of the rights of defense and efficient judicial safety" of Urdangarin. The defense believes the judge produced "statements of unique roundness"

"Every thing leads us to believe," stated Pascual Vives, that the judge "issued in haste a pre-trial" to gather on the judgment "claims and assertions with specific variety emphatically," and then cited a amount of them.

Particularly, Castro referred to the statement that "there is each indication" that Urdangarin not split with the actions associated to the Institute Nos following leaving workplace in 2006 on the recommendation of the Royal Home.

The instructor also cites the testimony of Urdangarin query immediately after "many witnesses" who testified to police that "he was constantly behind all the corporate network," which according to the judge also mentioned numerous suspects in court and in his view, "is supported by quite a few paperwork seized."

For the attorney Urdangarin with these claims Castro "violates the correct to defense" of the Duke of Palma, and that does not specify which witnesses, defendants and paperwork are concerned. The judge believes that it has not triggered any defenseless

Pascual Vives notes that the judge produced these statements in the existing "incipient phase of instruction" and stresses that produce a "clear helplessness" and have the "Plainly meant to undermine" the statement by Urdangarin in his testimony on 25 and 26 February.

Consequently, the attorney asks the judge in the letter, dated Tuesday, identifying witnesses, defendants and paperwork referred to in the auto.

The judge mentioned a day immediately after this request, in a vehicle in dismissing its claim but notes that the vehicle was referring to statements of the accused Miguel and Jose Luis Ballester Zorio and that of Urdangarin, and also documentation relating to the Basis Sport, Culture and Social Integration, whose advisory board he was president right after leaving Duke Nos.

The judge also mentioned that "there is any information that is not integrated into the result in and is not obtainable" the attorney, so it responds to "No helplessness has been triggered."